Thames Reach
Saturday 18 May 2013
Keyword Search
.

Daily Mail backs down over misleading article on homelessness

03 October 2012

A man found rough sleeping in North London

Thames Reach, Homeless Link and concerned individuals have been successful in getting the Daily Mail to back down over an article on homelessness which was both inaccurate and potentially prejudicial and in danger of encouraging racial discrimination.


Following complaints to the Press Complain Commission, the newspaper accepted a number of points which contradicted the article which appeared in July 2012 and claimed that army veterans were turned away from homeless shelters packed with immigrants.


The newspaper amended its article to indicate that although Somalis and Poles are accommodated in some shelters, they are not in the majority.


It accepted that accommodation in hostels was not free and that a homeless person must be in receipt of benefits, which have been linked to national insurance payments in the past.


It accepted that its figure of 25% of homeless people being former servicemen had come from a report issue in the 1990s and that that the British Legion had now put the figure at 6%.


It also accepted that it had been incorrect to state that benefits could not be claimed without an address, issuing a clarification to reflect this.


Jeremy Swain, Thames Reach Chief Executive, said: “This appallingly inaccurate article claimed that a typical homeless hostel resident was a person not born in this country who had been prioritised for a hostel space at the expense of former serviceman. In fact the nationalities named in the article, Somalis and Poles, make up a tiny minority of the hostel population and the figure given for the number of ex-services personnel sleeping rough on the street was grossly inflated.


“This is the kind of irresponsible reporting that can seriously undermine community relations and lead to the victimisation of minority groups in this country. I am delighted that the Mail has acknowledged that the article was fundamentally flawed and unconditionally surrendered on all the points we raised, and I thank all those people who joined with us in expressing revulsion at gutter journalism of this type.”